RE: still 1 problem ...

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:02:48 -0800

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Schulze [mailto:sca_at_andreasschulze.de]
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 1:56 PM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: opendkim-dev_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: Re: still 1 problem ...
>
> Sorry wasting your time. was (again) my fault: munging section is appended.
> But only if there are header included in the z tag been modified!

That's expected, since only with z= does opendkim have a view into the "before" and "after" of what's in the header. There's never a way to figure out what in the body changed, except for the case where an "l=" was present but the body is now shorter than that value; then you know there was truncation, but you don't know what was truncated.
Received on Fri Jan 27 2012 - 22:02:56 PST