On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:46:54PM +0200, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
> Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> >On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, SM wrote:
> >>The processing after the EOM should be quite fast. There is an overall
> >>timeout of 5 minutes which is configurable. The progress messages
> >>restart the timeout period. What is that second EOM timeout?
> >
> >How this could take five minutes, tripping the EOM timeout, given that
> >libopendkim provides much shorter DNS timeouts to the resolvers is
> >puzzling.
>
> A bug was found (last month) in the workers version of libmilter. Maybe
> this is the issue. In some situations, there may be a lot of threads
> being accumulated in the filter and generate some timeouts and block the
> filter. I've seen this here once only in many years. If you're using
> libmilter compiled with _FFR_WORKERS_MODEL, try this patch (which will
> be included in the next libmilter), which set a fd used by the workers
> controller to O_NONBLOCK.
No, we are still using the standard version of libmilter.
-- -Gary Mills- -Unix Group- -Computer and Network Services-Received on Mon Apr 18 2011 - 15:41:58 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sun May 15 2011 - 15:59:41 PST