On 01/Oct/10 00:53, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Second, sometime after the conversion to the 2.2.0 submission
> mechanism is complete, we will begin requiring GPG signing of
> submissions to the database.
Wouldn't it be more self-referential to sign it using DKIM?
Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote:
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: the signature could not be verified.
> Please remember that the signature file (.sig or .asc)
> should be the first file given on the command line.
> Message did not verify with GPG.
> 554 5.3.0 unknown mailer error 1
Received on Sat Oct 02 2010 - 07:39:11 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 13:50:01 PST