RE: RPATH bug opened

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:06:51 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendkim-dev-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-dev-
> bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Black
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 2:46 PM
> To: opendkim-dev_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: Re: RPATH bug opened
>
> On Thursday 08 April 2010 07:27:05 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: opendkim-dev-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-dev-
> > > bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Black
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 2:18 PM
> > > To: opendkim-dev_at_lists.opendkim.org
> > > Subject: Re: RPATH bug opened
> > >
> > > generally setting rpath isn't looked favourably upon by distros.
> > > http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue
> > >
> > > There's controversial pros and cons for and against rpaths.
> > >
> > > you've done it the right way though. You've only added it to one
> lib
> > > though.
> >
> > Perhaps it should be triggered by an "--enable-rpath" option to
> > ./configure?
>
> sounds very distro friendly - i like it.

Done for 2.0.2.
Received on Thu Apr 08 2010 - 00:06:59 PST