Re: Misc bits for 2.0.0

From: Daniel Black <daniel.subs_at_internode.on.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:34:53 +1100

On Saturday 27 February 2010 07:29:33 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Mike Markley wrote:
> >> Since the packaging process creates ./configure and all the Makefile.in
> >> files, I don't think the end users actually need to have any of
> >> autotools installed. They only need such things if they're modifying
> >> configure.ac or any of the Makefile.am files themselves; if that's the
> >> case, I think we can reasonably expect them to have current autotools
> >> anyway. But I'd be fine documenting what I'm using to build the
> >> package if you think that's good enough.
> >
> > I thought Daniel was taking a swipe at that one.
>
> True. Daniel, any update?
>
> I've updated the DEPENDENCIES section of the top-level README to cover all
> the optional libraries. Let me know if I've missed anything.

committed to README autoconf/make/libtool dependancies
Received on Fri Feb 26 2010 - 22:36:53 PST