Re: stupid question on LDAP support
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Mike Markley wrote:
> Makes sense now. We may want to put together a "suggestion" for a schema
> (perhaps using something invalid for the OIDs to force people to
> substitute their own) to aid implementers; I should be able to tackle
> that once I set up a testbed. I'll also propose some changes to the
> manpage or to README to make this more obvious.
I figured your questions meant the documentation was a little lacking.
Feel free to commit any improvements.
Received on Tue Feb 16 2010 - 20:15:14 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:32:52 PST