Re: KeyList revisited

From: SM <sm_at_resistor.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:40:42 -0800

Hi Murray,
At 21:52 05-02-10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>On second thought we can't do this because then adding a new signing
>key means a reload or a restart, something we specifically wanted to
>avoid. We'll have to read the keys on the fly.

Yes.

>We'd need to come up with similar logic for cases like LDAP and BDB
>where that level of control is not necessarily possible.

For BDB, we can concatenate the information and parse it to emulate
the DB logic. I'll need more time to do some testing with LDAP.

>To stick to our goal though, those differences need to be hidden
>from the user.

Actually no, we don't know what other information they might want to store.

Regards,
-sm
Received on Sun Feb 07 2010 - 15:42:01 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:32:52 PST