Re: FYI: libunbound building broken

From: Mike Markley <mike_at_markley.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:37:44 -0700

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:15:37PM -0700, SM <sm_at_resistor.net> wrote:
> I tested the following:
>
> ./configure --enable-arlib --with-unbound=/usr/local
>
> The "checking for libunbound" is done before the test for whether
> both arlib and unbound are set.
>
> Can that test be done earlier? This is more of an optimization and
> it might not be worth doing.

The bits that actually decide whether to set USE_UNBOUND happen just
before that test, so it would probably require some minor refactoring.

-- 
Mike Markley <mike_at_markley.org>
Mediocrity finds safety in standardization.
- Frederick Crane
Received on Sat Aug 15 2009 - 06:37:56 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:32:29 PST